中文摘要：
  在社會(huì)公正問題的大討論中，羅爾斯、諾齊克、哈耶克、麥金泰爾等當(dāng)代西方思想家的論述被反復(fù)引用和申說，而將馬克思恩格斯等經(jīng)典作家的觀點(diǎn)置于一種被忽視甚至被忘卻的狀態(tài)。形成這種狀態(tài)的原因是多方面的。對(duì)歷史背景和語境不作具體的分析，就難以把握馬克思恩格斯對(duì)于社會(huì)公正問題的真實(shí)態(tài)度和精神實(shí)質(zhì)，甚至?xí)贸鏊麄儾粌H沒有關(guān)于社會(huì)公正的理論，而且反對(duì)和拒斥從社會(huì)公正角度討論問題的結(jié)論。馬克思主義作為無產(chǎn)階級(jí)認(rèn)識(shí)和改造世界、求得自身解放和人類解放的世界觀和方法論，是真理與價(jià)值相統(tǒng)一的理論，也只有從科學(xué)向度與價(jià)值向度辯證統(tǒng)一的角度，才可能對(duì)作為價(jià)值之一種表現(xiàn)的公正問題作出合理的理解。公正既是一種價(jià)值觀念，具有評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的功能，也是實(shí)際的價(jià)值（包括利益、機(jī)會(huì)、權(quán)利等）分配的一種狀態(tài)，其中會(huì)涉及自由與平等的矛盾、形式公正與實(shí)質(zhì)公正的矛盾、一般與特殊的差別、平等與效率的抵牾、公正與不公正的對(duì)立，等等，只有運(yùn)用辯證思維的方法，才能對(duì)其復(fù)雜性獲得正確的認(rèn)識(shí)。 
英文摘要：
  (2)The Marxist Theory of Justice: Basic Dimensions and Methodological PrinciplesMa Junfeng·44· In the wideranging discussion of social justice issues, the theories of contemporary Western thinkers such as Rawls, Nozick, Hayek and MacIntyre are repeatedly cited and expounded. By contrast, for various reasons, classical writers like Marx and Engels have been overlooked or even forgotten. Without a concrete analysis of historical background and context, it is hard to grasp the true attitude and spiritual essence of the views of Marx and Engels on social justice. We might even conclude not only that they had no theory of social justice but that they opposed and rejected approaching questions from this angle. As a world outlook and methodology enabling the proletariat to know and transform the world and liberate themselves and mankind, Marxism is a theory that unites truth and value. A rational understanding of the issue of justice as an expression of value is only possible when the dimensions of science and value are dialectically combined. On the one hand, justice is a value concept that functions as a standard for evaluation; on the other, it refers to an actual state of the distribution of values (including interests, opportunities and rights) that inevitably involves the contradiction between freedom and equality and between formal and substantive justice, the difference between the general and the specific, the conflict between equality and efficiency, the opposition between justice and injustice and so on. Only a dialectical mode of thinking can ensure a correct understanding of the complexity of social justice issues.