中文摘要：
  在災(zāi)害管理研究領(lǐng)域，長期以來形成了“工程—技術(shù)”、“組織—制度”、“政治—社會”三種研究傳統(tǒng)和與之相應(yīng)的“災(zāi)害”、“危機(jī)”、“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”三大核心概念。隨著現(xiàn)實(shí)的發(fā)展，“災(zāi)害”概念在管理實(shí)踐中逐漸被“突發(fā)事件”概念所取代。在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、突發(fā)事件、危機(jī)這三個概念之間存在著內(nèi)在的邏輯關(guān)系：一是風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與危機(jī)之間的潛在因果關(guān)系，二是突發(fā)事件將這種潛在的因果關(guān)系顯性化。與此相應(yīng)，應(yīng)急管理也擴(kuò)展為包括風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理、危機(jī)管理在內(nèi)的動態(tài)管理過程。這個分析框架可以對應(yīng)急管理功能定位、應(yīng)急預(yù)案績效分析、治理結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化、突發(fā)事件問責(zé)和群體性事件治理進(jìn)行分析，以促進(jìn)與完善中國的災(zāi)害管理。

 
英文摘要：
  An Analytical Framework of Disaster Management in the Context of China.Tong Xing and Zhang Haibo.The field of disaster management has gradually evolved three important research traditions characterized by projects vs. technology, organizations vs. institutions and politics vs. society, and three core concepts characterized by disaster, crisis and risk. With the passage of time, the term “disaster” has gradually been replaced by “emergency” in the practice of disaster management. However, there is a logical reason to argue that risk, emergency and crisis are intrinsically linked. It is argued that causality exists between risk and crisis, while emergency brings the latent causality to the surface. Accordingly, the implications of emergency management have also been extended to refer to risk management, crisis management and dynamic management. This analytical framework can play an effective role in positioning emergency management functions, measuring the effects of emergency management programs and optimizing their structure, promoting a system of accountability and managing social unrest at various levels. In this way, China’s disaster management skills can be upgraded.